Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:45:59PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote: > >> >> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ram...@ramsayjones.plus.com> >> --- >> >> Hi Junio, >> >> I recently noticed that: >> >> $ make >pout 2>&1 >> $ ./git version >> git version 2.11.0.286.g109e8a9 >> $ git describe >> v2.11.0-286-g109e8a99d >> $ >> >> ... for non-release builds, the commit part of the version >> string was still using an --abbrev=7. > > It seems like this kind of discussion ought to go in the commit message. > :) > > That said, I think the right patch may be to just drop --abbrev > entirely. > ... > I think at that point it was a noop, as 7 should have been the default. > And now we probably ought to drop it, so that we can use the > auto-scaling default.
Yeah, I agree. It does mean that snapshot binaries built out of the same commit in the same repository before and after a repack have higher chances of getting named differently, which may surprise people, but that already is possible with a fixed length if the repacking involves pruning (albeit with lower probabilities), and I do not think it is a problem.
