On 12/07, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> wrote: > > Convert 'fill_directory()' to use the pathspec struct interface from > > using the '_raw' entry in the pathspec struct. > > > > Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> > > --- > > dir.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c > > index 7df292b..8730a4f 100644 > > --- a/dir.c > > +++ b/dir.c > > @@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ int fill_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, const struct > > pathspec *pathspec) > > len = common_prefix_len(pathspec); > > > > /* Read the directory and prune it */ > > - read_directory(dir, pathspec->nr ? pathspec->_raw[0] : "", len, > > pathspec); > > + read_directory(dir, pathspec->nr ? pathspec->items[0].match : "", > > + len, pathspec); > > Or even better, use common_prefix()'s return value here. I took me a > while to realize this code was not buggy. It is fine to just pick the > first item because the first <len> characters of _all_ pathspec items > must be the same. Something like this > > prefix = common_prefix(..) > read_directory(..., prefix, strlen(prefix), pathspec); > > expresses it much better. Yeah one extra mem allocation, no big deal > since fill_directory() is not called very often.
I didn't even notice that. Now looking at this you're right that its not immediately obvious that what's there is correct. I'll change this. > > > return len; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020 > > > -- > Duy -- Brandon Williams
