Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> This marks the count down to '3': two more patch series after this
> (really tiny ones) and we have a faster rebase -i.
Nice.
> Apart from mostly cosmetic patches (and the occasional odd bug that I
> fixed promptly), I used these patches since mid May to perform all of my
> interactive rebases. In mid June, I had the idea to teach rebase -i to
> run *both* scripted rebase and rebase--helper and to cross-validate the
> results. This slowed down all my interactive rebases since, but helped
> me catch three rather obscure bugs (e.g. that git commit --fixup unfolds
> long onelines and rebase -i still finds the correct original commit).
> ...
> Please note that the interdiff vs v1 is only of limited use: too many
> things changed in the meantime, in particular the prepare-sequencer
> branch that went through a couple of iterations before it found its way
> into git.git's master branch. So please take the interdiff with a
> mountain range of salt.
> ...
> Changes since v1:
> ...
> - removed the beautiful ordinal logic (to print out "1st", "2nd", "3rd"
> etc) and made things consistent with the current `rebase -i`.
It was removed because it was too Anglo-centric and unusable in i18n
context, no?
Judging from the list above, interdiff are pretty much all cosmetic
and that is why you say it is only of limited use, I guess.
... goes and reads the remainder and finds that these were
... all minor changes, mostly cosmetic, with a helper function
... refactored out or two and things of that nature.
It is actually a good thing. We do not want to see it deviate too
drastically from what you have been testing for some months.
Thanks.
