Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > I do agree that non-reentrancy is an issue that is worth solving, > though.
I sounded overly negative, but I do not think of any way other than this patch to solve the reentrancy issue without using qsort_s(). Between the two, my preference is still the latter, but I could be persuaded, I would guess.
