Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 08:19:53PM -0500, Kyle Meyer wrote:
>
>> > The other option is just "git checkout --detach", which is also used in
>> > the test suite. I tend to prefer it because it's a little more obvious
>> > to a reader.
>>
>> True, that does seem clearer. Seems I should've waited a bit before
>> sending out v2.
>
> I think it's OK either way. Junio can also mark it up while applying,
> too, if he has a preference.
I prefer <commit>^0 in scripts, simply because it is shorter, works
with any version of Git that knows how to detach, even the ones
before --detach was introduced. I offhand do not recall which
between <commit>^0 and <commit>^{} came earlier, but in practice I
saw nobody write the latter, so Dscho's suggestion is definitely an
improvement.
I do also care about "git checkout --detach" to keep working
correctly, but as long as we have dedicated tests to ensure that,
we'd be fine. In the case of the test being discussed, we assume
either should work correctly and the point of the test is not about
ensuring that <commit>^0 or --detach works, so either is OK.
Anyway, thanks for a patch and a review.
