Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> So what should we do if freshen_file() returns 0 which means that the >>> freshening failed? >> >> You tell me ;-) as you are the one who is proposing this feature. > > My answer is, we are not worse than freshening loose objects case > (especially since I took the idea from there).
I do not think so, unfortunately. Loose object files with stale timestamps are not removed as long as objects are still reachable. For the base/shared index file, the timestamp is the only thing that protects them from pruning, unless it is serving as the base file for the currently active $GIT_DIR/index that is split. >> What is the failure mode after such a premature GC happens? What >> does the end-user see? Can you try to (1) split the index (2) >> modify bunch of entries (3) remove the base/shared index with /bin/rm >> and then see how various Git commands fail? Do they fail gracefully? >> >> I am trying to gauge the seriousness of ignoring such an error here. > > If we fail to refresh it and the file is old enough and gc happens, > any index file referenced to it are broken. Any commands that read the > index will die(). The best you could do is delete $GIT_DIR/index and > read-tree HEAD.
