Hi Junio, On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > > > You stated elsewhere that converting a script into a builtin should focus > > on a faithful conversion. > > > > The original code is: > > > > . "$author_script" > > [...] > > If the code in the sequencer.c reads things other than the three > variables we ourselves set, and make them into environment variables > and propagate to subprocesses (hooks and editors), it would be a > bug. The original did not intend to do that (the dot-sourcing is > overly loose than reading three known variables and nothing else, > but is OK because we do not support the case where end users muck > with the file). Also, writing FOO=BAR alone (not "export FOO=BAR" > or "FOO=BAR; export FOO") to the file wouldn't have exported FOO to > subprocesses anyway. That analysis cannot be completely correct, as the GIT_AUTHOR_* variables *are* used by the `git commit` subprocess. In any case, it is clear that we (I include all reviewers here) messed this patch series up quite a bit. Hence I will be more careful from now on to only act on suggestions that do, in fact, improve the patch series from my point of view. Ciao, Johannes
