Hi Junio, On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Perhaps instead of adding "is it configured?" flag that is too
> broadly named and has too narrow meaning, would it make more sense
> to introduce "int can_prune(struct remote *remote)" that looks at
> the remote refspecs?
That ("can we prune?") is not the question we need to ask when determining
whether we can rename a remote to a new name.
Ciao,
Johannes
