Jacob Keller <jacob.kel...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> I do not know if it is clear enough that 'option' in the last >> sentence is a placeholder. I then wondered if spelling it as >> `--no-<long>` would make it a bit clearer, but that is ugly. > > To be fair, this is exactly how the rest of the doc spells these > things, so I would rather be consistent with the doc as is, and a > future patch could clean this up. See OPT_SET_INT, for an example of > `--no-option`.
Ah, OK, then I have no issues with it. > Maybe we can rephrase this "The list is reset via `--no-option`"? I think I saw that in your latest interdiff and I think it is good. Thanks.
