On 01/25/2017 01:21 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>
>>> Do not PGP sign your patch, at least *for now*. (...)
>>
>
> And maybe these 2 small words are the bug in the documentation?
> Shall we drop the "at least for now" part, like so:
>
> ---8<---
> From 2c4fe0e67451892186ff6257b20c53e088c9ec67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Beller <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:19:13 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> index 08352deaae..28da4ad2d4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> @@ -216,12 +216,12 @@ that it will be postponed.
> Exception: If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask
> you to re-send them using MIME, that is OK.
>
> -Do not PGP sign your patch, at least for now. Most likely, your
> -maintainer or other people on the list would not have your PGP
> -key and would not bother obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not
> -judged by who you are; a good patch from an unknown origin has a
> -far better chance of being accepted than a patch from a known,
> -respected origin that is done poorly or does incorrect things.
> +Do not PGP sign your patch. Most likely, your maintainer or other
> +people on the list would not have your PGP key and would not bother
> +obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not judged by who you are; a good
> +patch from an unknown origin has a far better chance of being accepted
> +than a patch from a known, respected origin that is done poorly or
> +does incorrect things.
>
> If you really really really really want to do a PGP signed
> patch, format it as "multipart/signed", not a text/plain message
>
It definitely is an improvement. Though it would still leave me puzzled
when finding a section about signing just below.
Is changing heading (5) too big a change? Like so:
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 08352de..71898dc 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ patch.
*2* The mailing list: [email protected]
-(5) Sign your work
+(5) Certify your work by signing off.
To improve tracking of who did what, we've borrowed the
"sign-off" procedure from the Linux kernel project on patches
