Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > So in that sense doing the errno dance as close to the caller who cares > is the most _obvious_ thing, even if it isn't the shortest.
Yup. > It would be nice if there was a way to annotate a function as > errno-safe, and then transitively compute which other functions were > errno-safe when they do not call any errno-unsafe function. I don't know > if any static analyzers allow that kind of custom annotation, though > (and also I wonder whether the cost/benefit of maintaining those > annotations would be worth it). Double yup.
