On 02/14, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Thomas Gummerer <[email protected]> writes: > > > I'm almost convinced of special casing "-p". (Maybe I'm easy to > > convince as well, because it would be convenient ;) ) However it's a > > bit weird that now "git stash -p file" would work, but "git stash -m > > message" wouldn't. Maybe we should do it the other way around, and > > only special case "-q", and see if there is an non option argument > > after that? From a glance at the options that's the only one where > > "git stash -<option> <verb>" could make sense to the user. > > Special-casing the allowed cases makes it easier to change the behavior > in the future if needed: it's easy to add special cases and it doesn't > break backward compatibility. > > So, if we don't have a good reason to do otherwise, I'd rather stay on > the future-proof side.
Ok, after reading the rest of the messages in the thread I'm convinced we should just special case "-p" for now. It's by far my most used stash command as well, after using git stash without any arguments. > -- > Matthieu Moy > http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
