On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As a rule, I don't see much value in writing a framework that works > only for one case, that smells more like over-engineering. If we had > two cases (hg and bzr), then we might be able to know with a modicum > of certainty what such a framework should have. So I would prefer to > have two standalone remote-helpers, and _then_ do a framework to > simplify both, but not before. But that's my personal opinion. > > Now that I have free time, I might be able to spend time writing such > a proof-of-concept remote-bzr, and a simple framework. But I would be > concentrated on remote-hg. Actually, there's no point in that; there's already a git-remote-bzr: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr-git/bzr-git/trunk/view/head:/git-remote-bzr So, what do we need a python framework for? Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
