Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> writes:
> There is a third category, and this one *does* come as a surprise to me.
> It appears that at least *some* patches' Date: lines are either ignored or
> overridden or changed on their way from the mailing list into Git's commit
> history. There was only one commit in that commit range:
>
> 3c0cb0c (read_loose_refs(): read refs using resolve_ref_recursively(),
> Michael Haggerty 2017-02-09)
>
> This one was committed with an author date "Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:53:52
> +0100" but it appears that there was no mail sent to the Git mailing list
I think this is this one:
<[email protected]>
Recent "What's cooking" lists the topic this one is part with this
comment:
The tip one is newer than the one posted to the list but was sent
privately by the author via his GitHub repository.
