Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 08:56:11PM -0400, Kyle Meyer wrote:

[...]

>>   * moving the here-documents for log creation into the following
>>     tests, but I don't think it's worth it because it makes already
>>     long lines even longer.
>
> Yeah, they're quite long. Probably something like:
>
>   # arguments: <from> <to> <time> <msg>
>   reflog () {
>       printf '%s %s %s <%s> %s +0000\t%s' \
>               "$1" "$2" \
>               "$GIT_COMMITTER_NAME" "$GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL" \
>               "$3" "$4"
>   }
>
>   test_expect_success 'verify $m log' '
>       {
>               reflog $Z $A 1117150200 "Initial Creation" &&
>               reflog $A $B 1117150260 "Switch" &&
>               reflog $B $A 1117150860 &&
>       } >expect &&
>       test_cmp expect .git/logs/$m
>   '
>
> wouldn't be too bad. Or maybe it's worse, because the actual format is
> all tangled up in that printf statement. ;)
>
> I'm OK with it either way.

Heh, I didn't consider that option.  I suppose I'll stick with the
here-document for now because, to my eyes, it seems a bit easier to
read.

-- 
Kyle

Reply via email to