On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Michael J Gruber <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: > >> Are we at a point where we can still rename the new feature at least? If >> yes, and keeping everything else is mandatory, than "workspace" or >> "working space" may be a serious contender for naming the new thing. > > I do not have a good answer to the first question, but workspace > does sound like a good name for what this feature is trying to > achieve. >
Now is not too late to rename the command from worktree to workspace (and keep "worktree" as an alias that will be eventually deleted). Should we do it? I would keep file names, function names... unchanged though, not worth the amount of new conflicts. -- Duy
