On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> +/* ref_store_init flags */
>> +#define REF_STORE_READ (1 << 0)
>
> I asked [1] in reply to v5 whether `REF_STORE_READ` is really necessary
> but I don't think you replied. Surely a reference store that we can't
> read would be useless? Can't we just assume that any `ref_store` is
> readable and drop this constant?
I deleted it then I realized many lines like these
files_downcast(ref_store, REF_STORE_READ, "read_raw_ref");
would become
files_downcast(ref_store, 0, "read_raw_ref");
I think for newcomers, the former gives a better hint what the second
argument is than a plain zero in the latter, so I'm inclined to keep
it.
--
Duy
