On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> wrote:
> That the gist of how I'm hoping to solve the problem. Hopefully that was
> clear enough to get some feedback on.
Junio wrote in "What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2017, #10; Fri, 24)"
> I saw no particular issues myself. Do others find this series good
> (not just "meh--it is harmless" but I want to hear a positive "yes
> these are good changes")?
So I reviewed them again, and I think they are good to go.
As a followup we may want to consider this
diff --git a/setup.c b/setup.c
index 56cd68ba93..bdc294091a 100644
--- a/setup.c
+++ b/setup.c
@@ -944,6 +944,10 @@ const char *setup_git_directory_gently(int *nongit_ok)
prefix = setup_git_directory_gently_1(nongit_ok);
env_prefix = getenv(GIT_TOPLEVEL_PREFIX_ENVIRONMENT);
+ if (prefix && env_prefix)
+ die("BUG: can't invoke command in sub directory with %s set",
+ GIT_TOPLEVEL_PREFIX_ENVIRONMENT);
+
if (env_prefix)
prefix = env_prefix;
--
Thanks,
Stefan
