On 03/31/2017 06:01 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> 
>> This version literally only contains a few commit message changes and
>> one minor comment changes relative to v1. The code is identical. I
>> wasn't sure whether it is even worth sending this patch series to the
>> ML again; Junio, if you'd prefer I just send a link to a published
>> branch in such cases, please let me know.
> 
> The review on the list is not about letting me pick it up, but is
> about giving reviewing contributors a chance to comment.  I think
> for a series this important ;-) it is good that you are giving it
> multiple exposures so that people who were offline the last time can
> have a chance to look at it, even if the update is minimum.
> 
>> This patch series is also available from my GitHub fork [2] as branch
>> "separate-ref-cache". These patches depend on Duy's
>> nd/files-backend-git-dir branch.
> 
> I am getting the impression that the files-backend thing as well as
> this topic are ready for 'next'.  Please stop me if I missed something
> in these topics (especially the other one) that needs updating
> before that happens.

I don't know of any remaining problems with these two patch series
(aside from a couple of cosmetic problems that I just pointed out about
v7 of nd/files-backend-git-dir). I'm pretty confident about both of them.

Duy, have you looked over my patch series? Since you've been working in
the area, your feedback would be very welcome, if you have the time for it.

Michael

Reply via email to