On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Jacob Keller <jacob.kel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Never mind. git ls-files doesn't support showing files for a specific >> ancient history. (I guess you'd use ls-tree for that?). I'm guessing >> we want to run in the actual work-tree for ls-files here. >> >> Does "is_submodule_initialized()" going to ensure that we only operate >> on a submodule that's currently checked out? > > I think for that we rather want to use is_submodule_populated. > And I think it would make sense as well to check for that instead > of the initialized state. > > Thanks, > Stefan
Right ok. Thanks, Jake
