+ Junio, Jacob
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote: > The meat is in the second patch: > The commit 31224cbdc7 (clone: recursive and reference option triggers > submodule alternates, 2016-08-17) argued for any further `submodule > update` > to respect the initial setup. This is not the case if you only pass > '--reference[-if-able]' to the initial clone without instructing to > recurse into submodules. > > If there are submodules however the user is likely to later run > a 'submodule update --init' to obtain the submodules. In this case we > also want to have the references available. > > The first patch produces a nice helper function and some refactoring. > > Thanks, > Stefan > > Stefan Beller (2): > submodule.c: add has_submodules to check if we have any submodules > clone: remember references for submodules even when not recursing > > builtin/checkout.c | 2 +- > builtin/clone.c | 8 +++-- > builtin/fetch.c | 2 +- > builtin/read-tree.c | 2 +- > builtin/submodule--helper.c | 6 ++-- > submodule.c | 78 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > submodule.h | 8 ++++- > unpack-trees.c | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.12.2.575.gb14f27f917 >
