On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:14:18AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > > >> Ah, OK, and now I understand why you called this a "bug" (which is > >> older and do not need to be addressed as part of 2.13) in the > >> original message. The new tests check requests that ought to > >> produce an empty packfile as the result actually do, but with the > >> current code, the reuse code does not work with --local and friends > >> and ends up including what was requested to be excluded. > > > > Right. Did you want me to try re-wording the commit message, or does it > > make sense now? > > It does make sense to me now, but I do not speak for all future > readers of "git log", so...
I guess what I was asking was: do you still think it was unclear, or do you think you were just being dense? I don't feel like I gave any information in the follow-on explanation that wasn't in the commit message, so I wasn't clear if I worded it better or if it just sunk in better. -Peff
