On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 02:41:50AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> But that I meant that when I introduce a regression it's like I'm >> killing all that is good and sacred about git, and when you do it's >> everything but that. > > The rhetoric in this statement is a good indication that there is > nothing productive to come from our discussing it anymore.
The point is still true. >> > If you want to seriously propose changing the behavior of "git commit", >> > I think the best thing would be to make a real patch, laying out the >> > pros and cons in the commit message, and post it. I would not be >> > surprised if the other list participants have stopped reading our thread >> > at this point, and the idea is going otherwise unnoticed. >> >> I would, if I saw any chance in it actually going through. > > Well, it certainly will not go through if you do not try. At least I wouldn't be wasting my time. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
