On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Sitaram Chamarty <sitar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It seems to me that whatever namespaces can do, can functionally be > done using just a subdirectory of branches. The only real > differences I can see are (a) a client sees less branch clutter, and > (b) a fetch/clone pulls down less if the big stuff is in another > namespace. > > I would like to understand what other uses/reasons were thought of.
(I should mention that I am asking from the client perspective. I know that on the server this has potential to save a lot of disk space). > I looked for discussion on the ml archives. I found the patch series > but could not easily find much *discussion* of the feature and its > design. I found one post [1] that indicated that "part of the > rationale..." (being what I described above), but I would like to > understand the *rest* of the rationale. > > Pointers to gmane are also fine, or brief descriptions of uses [being] > made of this. > > [1]: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/175832/match=namespace > > Thanks > > -- > Sitaram -- Sitaram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
