On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Would be nice in the future to have another revision specification
> like @{wc} for "HEAD + working copy". I guess this technically isn't a
> revision, but something along those lines. Or maybe just an
> --include-wc for diff or something.
I think the spec would *just* be the working tree, if it ever got
implemented - I don't think it makes much sense to say "HEAD + working
copy".
Maybe something like this would do what you want?
# Diff Merge Base
dmb = "!f() { : git diff ; ref=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD); git
reset --soft $(git merge-base @{upstream} HEAD); git diff; git reset
--soft \"$ref\"; }; f"
