On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:17:30PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > > > That is a good question. That confirmation step does come after they > > have typed their cover letter. However, if they are using --compose, > > they are dumped in their editor with something like: > > > > From Jeff King <p...@peff.net> # This line is ignored. > > GIT: Lines beginning in "GIT:" will be removed. > > GIT: Consider including an overall diffstat or table of contents > > GIT: for the patch you are writing. > > GIT: > > GIT: Clear the body content if you don't wish to send a summary. > > From: Jeff King <p...@peff.net> > > Subject: > > In-Reply-To: > > > > which I think would count as sufficient notice of the address being > > used. > > OK. Tentatively I replaced your old series with these 8 patches > including the last one, as I tend to agree with the value the > earlier clean-up in the series gives us in the longer term. As you > and Felipe discussed, we may want to replace the last one with a > simpler "don't bother asking" patch, but I think that is more or > less an orthogonal issue.
I'm not sure how orthogonal it is. The latter half of my series is about exposing the user_ident_sufficiently_given() flag. If we go with Felipe's patch, then that exposed information has no users, and it may not be worth it (OTOH, it's possible that some third-party script may want it). -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
