> On 23 May 2017, at 10:43, Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 23 May 2017, at 07:22, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>>> + sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (err || errno == EPIPE) {
>>>>
>>>> This looks strange, at first glance.
>>>> Do we set errno to 0 before ?
>>>> Or is there a trick that EPIPE can only be reached,
>>>> if it is "our" error ?
>>>
>>> You are right and I'll fix it!
>>> Thanks for reminding me!
>>> Peff also noticed that some time ago:
>>> http://public-inbox.org/git/20170411200520.oivytvlzkdu7b...@sigill.intra.peff.net/
>>
>> Ben Peart's bp/sub-process-convert-filter topic also had the same
>> EPIPE issues in its earlier incarnation, IIRC. I haven't looked at
>> this topic for some time, but I wonder if we can share code with it.
>
> That's right. There might be some code sharing opportunity with Ben's
> code that is already in "next":
> https://github.com/git/git/blob/next/convert.c#L660-L677
>
> Would it be useful for you if I send v5 with the changes rebased
> onto "next"?
Hi Junio,
sorry for bugging you again, but Ben's topic did not make it to "master"
today. Is it OK if I rebase my topic onto "next" and resend?
Thanks,
Lars
