2017-06-06 10:49 GMT+03:00 Luke Diamand <l...@diamand.org>:
> On 6 June 2017 at 08:00, Luke Diamand <l...@diamand.org> wrote:
>> On 6 June 2017 at 00:29, Luke Diamand <l...@diamand.org> wrote:
>>> On 5 June 2017 at 19:50, Андрей Ефанов <1134t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2017-06-04 14:09 GMT+03:00 Luke Diamand <l...@diamand.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The problem, as I see it, is that before syncing changes in the given
>>>>> > range, p4 task does not sync to cl1 version of the repo, and applies
>>>>> > commits to the empty repository.
>>>>> > Is it a bug or my misunderstanding of how git p4 should work?
>>>>>
>>>>> Possibly I'm misunderstanding what you're doing! Can you give a
>>>>> sequence of steps to show the problem?
>>>>
>>>> What I meant is:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Create p4 depot
>>>> 2. Add first.file (CL 2)
>>>> 3. Add second.file (at CL 3)
>>>> 4. Add third.file (at CL 4)
>>>> 5. Modify first.file (at CL 5)
>>>> 4. git-p4 clone //depot@3,5
>>>>
>>>> In this case first.file, will not be represented in the repository.
>>>
>>> Hmmm, it's not working right for me. Although in my case I seem to be
>>> missing the second file.
>>>
>>> It's fine if I don't use the revision range "3,5".
>>
>> It's also fine if I do:
>>
>> git p4 sync //depot@3
>> cd depot
>> git p4 rebase
>
> It seems to be something to do with the code around line 3395 that says:
>
>     if self.changeRange == "@all":
>         self.changeRange = ""
>     elif ',' not in self.changeRange:
>
> It's finding a lower revision number with which to later call
> importHeadRevision(), but that only seems to be called if the revision
> range does *not* have a "," in it. As a result, we never actually call
> importHeadRevision() and so files end up missing.
>
> The obvious fix of fishing out the "@3" from the "@3,5" revision range
> works in this instance, but breaks some of the regression tests.
>
> Luke

I did the same change before and it worked for me. I'd like to find
out if it is a bug (I think it is), a normal behavior or am I doing
something wrong.

So according to what you say, it is a bug.

Andrew

Reply via email to