Sahil Dua <sahildua2...@gmail.com> writes: > + cat >expect <<-\EOF && > + branch.dest.key1=value1 > + some.gar.b=age > + branch.dest.key2=value2 > + EOF > + cat >config.branch <<\EOF && > +;; Comment for source > +[branch "source"] > + ;; Comment for the source value > + key1 = value1 > + ;; Comment for some.gar > +[some "gar"] > + ;; Comment for the some.gar value > + b = age > + ;; Comment for source, again > +[branch "source"] > + ;; Comment for the source value, again > + key2 = value2 > +EOF
Indenting using <<- would make it easier to read. I.e. cat >config.branch <<-\EOF && ;; Comment for ... [branch "source"] ;; Comment for ... ... EOF > + cat config.branch >>.git/config && > + git branch -m source dest && > + git config -f .git/config -l | grep -F -e source -e dest -e some.gar > >actual && > + test_cmp expect actual && > + > + # ...and that the comments for those sections are also > + # preserved. > + cat config.branch | sed "s/\"source\"/\"dest\"/" >expect && > + grep -A 9001 "Comment for source" .git/config >actual && Where does 9001 come from? Is that just "an arbitrary large number"? Besides, "grep -A" is quite unportable. Would sed -n -e "/Comment for source/,$p" .git/config >actual work equally well? > + test_cmp expect actual > +' > + > test_expect_success 'deleting a symref' ' > git branch target && > git symbolic-ref refs/heads/symref refs/heads/target && > > -- > https://github.com/git/git/pull/363