Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91...@gmail.com> writes: > That said, in case my interpretation that "'prepare-commit-msg' hook is > not to be shipped due to it's uselessness" is correct, the reply of > this mail as a whole seems to contradict it.
That is because I wear multiple hats, because I try to help in different ways, and because open source is not a battle to see whose idea is more right, but is a cooperative process to find a better solution together. As a fellow contributor, I do not think that removing the hint that is commented out, which is meant to be helpful to users while in their editor and which will be removed after the editor finishes anyway, is a useful enough example to keep the now otherwise useless sample hook. But as the maintainer, I can see that you are still making sincere efforts to come up with a useful example and improve the end-user experience, and more importantly, I haven't heard from other people what they think---the only thing I have are different opinions from two people. That is why I am not deciding and telling you to go find another area to hack in. At the same time, I found that your implementation of the idea, i.e. removal of the commented-out hint, can be improved. With an improved implementation of the proposed solution, it may have a better chance to be supported by others on the list, and equally importantly, if it turns out that other people do support what this patch tries to do, i.e. keep the sample hook alive by replacing the now useless examples with this one, we would have a better implementation of it. And that is something I can help with, while I, the maintainer, is waiting. Oh, by the way, what the maintainer is waiting for is not just "me too"s; this is not exactly a "having more people wins" democracy.
