On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 09:10 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > That's interesting. In that case, I'll go with the suggested statement, > > happily! > > It is not interesting at all. It actually is disturbing that you > had the notion that these are "valid" command lines. > Seems I've used a sloppy statement, sorry about that. I actually thought these were valid because they "worked", no other reason.
> We perhaps need to somehow make sure new users won't be led to the > misunderstanding. Improving our documentation is a good first step. That's something I could help with. -- Kaartic
