Re: Change in output as a result of patch

[Kaartic Sivaraam]

On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 14:25 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I suspect that with a moderately-sized refactoring around
> validate_new_branchname() function, this should be doable.  Instead
> of passing two "int" parameters force and attr_only, make them into
> a single "unsigned flag"
I guess it's not possible to merge the two parameters into one as the
following code path shouldn't be taken when 'attr_only' is set,

    if (!attr_only) {
            const char *head;
            struct object_id oid;

            head = resolve_ref_unsafe("HEAD", 0, oid.hash, NULL);
            if (!is_bare_repository() && head && !strcmp(head, ref->buf))
                    die(_("Cannot force update the current branch."));
    }

and I guess this means the 'attr_only' can't merged with 'force'.

Further, I saw this in 'branch.h'

>  NEEDSWORK: This needs to be split into two separate functions in the
>  longer run for sanity.

Any ways in which I could help with this?

-- 
Kaartic