Martin Ågren <martin.ag...@gmail.com> writes:
>> But “your branch is up-to-date” is INCORRECT. And, because it’s
>> incorrect, it conveys an odd and unsettling experience to native
>> English speakers whenever they read it.
>>
>> If you’re curious, you can find plenty of discussion of this point of
>> grammar. Here’s just one example:
>> https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/180611/do-i-keep-myself-up-to-date-or-up-to-date-on-something.
>
> There is also some previous discussion on this very list:
> https://public-inbox.org/git/calftnmerxgetucvbo8zmvkcr302vq2s4htpohxae5nefmjt...@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
>
> The code base contains a few instances of "up-to-date" and "up to date".
> A tree wide sweep could be made to update user-visible strings in the
> code and in the documentation. Fixing source code comments seems like
> overkill.
It should be safe to update any message that is meant for human
consumption (i.e. those inside the _("... message ...")) i18n
marker). As the use of "up-to-date" dates back to the days when
Linus was still doing much code for our project, I suspect there may
be some plumbing message that contains the phrase that scripts
expect to stay spelled that way, and it is not OK to "fix" them.
Thanks.
