Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> [Discarded] >> >> * nd/prune-in-worktree (2017-04-24) 12 commits >> . rev-list: expose and document --single-worktree >> . revision.c: --reflog add HEAD reflog from all worktrees >> . files-backend: make reflog iterator go through per-worktree reflog >> . revision.c: --all adds HEAD from all worktrees >> . refs: remove dead for_each_*_submodule() >> . revision.c: use refs_for_each*() instead of for_each_*_submodule() >> . refs: add refs_head_ref() >> . refs: move submodule slash stripping code to get_submodule_ref_store >> . refs.c: refactor get_submodule_ref_store(), share common free block >> . revision.c: --indexed-objects add objects from all worktrees >> . revision.c: refactor add_index_objects_to_pending() >> . revision.h: new flag in struct rev_info wrt. worktree-related refs >> >> "git gc" and friends when multiple worktrees are used off of a >> single repository did not consider the index and per-worktree refs >> of other worktrees as the root for reachability traversal, making >> objects that are in use only in other worktrees to be subject to >> garbage collection. > > I'm back and will try to continue this. Is it discarded because of > lack of progress, or because the problem is already fixed some other > way? A quick "git log --oneline" on important files has not revealed > anything.
Welcome back. I ejected it out of 'pu' due to inactivity and possibly because I saw some conflicts with topics that were making progress back then. I do not offhand know if the old one still merges cleanly to 'pu', but it certainly wasn't because the topic was deemed unnecessary. Thanks.
