Prathamesh Chavan <pc44...@gmail.com> writes:

> Introduce function get_submodule_displaypath() to replace the code
> occurring in submodule_init() for generating displaypath of the
> submodule with a call to it.

Looks like a quite straight-forward refactoring.

> +static char *get_submodule_displaypath(const char *path, const char *prefix)
> +{
> +     const char *super_prefix = get_super_prefix();
> +
> +     if (prefix && super_prefix) {
> +             BUG("cannot have prefix '%s' and superprefix '%s'",
> +                 prefix, super_prefix);
> +     } else if (prefix) {
> +             struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> +             char *displaypath = xstrdup(relative_path(path, prefix, &sb));
> +             strbuf_release(&sb);
> +             return displaypath;

Use of xstrdup() would waste one extra allocation and copy, no?  In
other words, wouldn't this do the same thing?

        ... {
                struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;

                relative_path(path, prefix, &sb);
                return strbuf_detach(&sb, NULL);

> @@ -363,7 +375,6 @@ static void init_submodule(const char *path, const char 
> *prefix, int quiet)
>        * Set active flag for the submodule being initialized
>        */
>       if (!is_submodule_active(the_repository, path)) {
> -             strbuf_reset(&sb);
>               strbuf_addf(&sb, "submodule.%s.active", sub->name);
>               git_config_set_gently(sb.buf, "true");
>       }

This is because sb will stay untouched with the use of the new
helper.  With the way this single strbuf is reused throughout this
function, I cannot help wondering if the prevailing pattern of
resetting and then using is a mistake.  If the strbuf is mostly used
as a scratchpad, wouldn't it make more sense to use it and then
clean up when you are done with it?

I.e. something along this line that shows only two uses...

 builtin/submodule--helper.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
index 0ff9dd0b85..84ded4b2e9 100644
--- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c
+++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
@@ -363,9 +363,9 @@ static void init_submodule(const char *path, const char 
*prefix, int quiet)
         * Set active flag for the submodule being initialized
         */
        if (!is_submodule_active(the_repository, path)) {
-               strbuf_reset(&sb);
                strbuf_addf(&sb, "submodule.%s.active", sub->name);
                git_config_set_gently(sb.buf, "true");
+               strbuf_reset(&sb);
        }
 
        /*
@@ -373,7 +373,6 @@ static void init_submodule(const char *path, const char 
*prefix, int quiet)
         * To look up the url in .git/config, we must not fall back to
         * .gitmodules, so look it up directly.
         */
-       strbuf_reset(&sb);
        strbuf_addf(&sb, "submodule.%s.url", sub->name);
        if (git_config_get_string(sb.buf, &url)) {
                if (!sub->url)
@@ -410,9 +409,9 @@ static void init_submodule(const char *path, const char 
*prefix, int quiet)
                                _("Submodule '%s' (%s) registered for path 
'%s'\n"),
                                sub->name, url, displaypath);
        }
+       strbuf_reset(&sb);
 
        /* Copy "update" setting when it is not set yet */
-       strbuf_reset(&sb);
        strbuf_addf(&sb, "submodule.%s.update", sub->name);
        if (git_config_get_string(sb.buf, &upd) &&
            sub->update_strategy.type != SM_UPDATE_UNSPECIFIED) {


Reply via email to