On 08/22, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > * bw/submodule-config-cleanup (2017-08-03) 17 commits > - submodule: remove gitmodules_config > - unpack-trees: improve loading of .gitmodules > - submodule-config: lazy-load a repository's .gitmodules file > - submodule-config: move submodule-config functions to submodule-config.c > - submodule-config: remove support for overlaying repository config > - diff: stop allowing diff to have submodules configured in .git/config > - submodule: remove submodule_config callback routine > - unpack-trees: don't respect submodule.update > - submodule: don't rely on overlayed config when setting diffopts > - fetch: don't overlay config with submodule-config > - submodule--helper: don't overlay config in update-clone > - submodule--helper: don't overlay config in remote_submodule_branch > - add, reset: ensure submodules can be added or reset > - submodule: don't use submodule_from_name > - t7411: check configuration parsing errors > - Merge branch 'bc/object-id' into bw/submodule-config-cleanup > - Merge branch 'bw/grep-recurse-submodules' into bw/submodule-config-cleanup > > Code clean-up to avoid mixing values read from the .gitmodules file > and values read from the .git/config file. > > So, after the recent discussion around submodule.<name>.update (and > its resolution "use submodule.<name>.active; "reset --hard" must > ignore the .update thing"), this is now good to go, I presume? > Please yell at me that I am clueless if that is not the case ;-)
Yep I came to the same conclusion that you did so this should be good to go! -- Brandon Williams
