Martin von Zweigbergk <martinv...@gmail.com> writes:

> In cases where HEAD is not supposed to be updated, there is no reason
> that "git reset" should require a commit, a tree should be enough. So
> make "git reset $rev^{tree}" work just like "git reset $rev", except
> that the former will not update HEAD (since there is no commit to
> point it to).

That is a horrible design I have to nack, unless you require
pathspec.  You cannot tell what "git reset $sha1" would do without
checking the type of the object $sha1 refers to.  If you do this
only when pathspec is present, then the design is very reasonable.

> Disallow --soft with trees, since that is about updating only HEAD.

Likewise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to