On 9/26/2017 6:44 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:30:13 +0000 Jeff Hostetler <g...@jeffhostetler.com> wrote:+ if (filter_options.relax) {Add some documentation about how this differs from ignore_missing_links in struct rev_info.
It's unclear what that field means. (It's not documented that I saw.) And it is explicitly turned on and off in pack-bitmap.c, so again I'm not sure how that agrees with what I'm doing. My relax field is probably an interim thing (to allow rev-list, index-pack, and friends not complain about missing objects during my development). I suspect that you and I will need to merge our efforts here. You have a similar variable "revs->exclude_promisor_objects". But I need to study how our usages differ. Thanks, Jeff
