Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]> writes: >> Andreas Heiduk wrote:
>>> +1, Thanks for spotting. >> >> Thanks for looking it over. Can we add your Reviewed-by? (See [1] >> for what this means.) > > I would just do "Acked-by: Andreas" after seeing such an obvious > admission of guilt & appreciation for fixing in the exchange. Oh! I had missed that context. Your instinct would have been right (and is born out by Andreas's reply to me). I was just fishing, but in this context there was no reason to fish for more than the Ack that was already there. > Would we rather want to make it more formal like how Linux folks do > the Reviewed-by: thing? Separate from this example: yes, I think adopting Linux's Reviewed-by convention would be a good thing. When I see a positive reply to a patch, I often wonder whether an ack or a fuller reviewed-by is intended, and Linux's way of formalizing that appeals to me. I'll try sending a patch to add it to SubmittingPatches tomorrow morning (Stefan had also been hinting recently about this being something worth trying). Thank you, Jonathan
