On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:56:05PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote: > The function has always been documented as returning 0 or -1. It is in > fact `void`. Correct that. As part of the rearrangements we lose the > mention that `delete_tempfile()` might set `errno`. Because there is > no return value, the user can't really know whether it did anyway.
Right, your documentation change makes sense. Thanks for catching this. I was curious if this inconsistency was introduced during review, but even the initial version to the list returns void. So I guess it happened sometime during the writing. :) -Peff
