Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] for-each-ref: let upstream/push optionally remote
> ref name
No verb? s/optionally/report/ perhaps?
> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> index 4819707d032..b4b2c9b2190 100644
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static struct used_atom {
> struct align align;
> struct {
> enum {
> - RR_REF, RR_TRACK, RR_TRACKSHORT, RR_REMOTE_NAME
> + RR_REF, RR_TRACK, RR_TRACKSHORT,
> RR_REMOTE_NAME, RR_REMOTE_REF
> } option;
> struct refname_atom refname;
> unsigned int nobracket : 1, push : 1, push_remote : 1;
> @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ static void remote_ref_atom_parser(const struct
> ref_format *format, struct used_
> else if (!strcmp(s, "remotename")) {
> atom->u.remote_ref.option = RR_REMOTE_NAME;
> atom->u.remote_ref.push_remote = 1;
> + } else if (!strcmp(s, "remoteref")) {
> + atom->u.remote_ref.option = RR_REMOTE_REF;
> + atom->u.remote_ref.push_remote = 1;
> } else {
> atom->u.remote_ref.option = RR_REF;
>
> refname_atom_parser_internal(&atom->u.remote_ref.refname,
> @@ -1262,6 +1265,14 @@ static void fill_remote_ref_details(struct used_atom
> *atom, const char *refname,
> *s = xstrdup(remote);
> else
> *s = "";
> + } else if (atom->u.remote_ref.option == RR_REMOTE_REF) {
> + int explicit, for_push = starts_with(atom->name, "push");
Hmph, the previous step got rid of starts_with() rather nicely by
introducing atom->u.remote_ref.push bit; can't we do the same in
this step?
Other than that, looks nicer.
Thanks.
