On 10/10, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 13:15:02 -0700
> Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> wrote:
>
> > + switch (determine_protocol_version_server()) {
> > + case protocol_v1:
> > + if (advertise_refs || !stateless_rpc)
> > + packet_write_fmt(1, "version 1\n");
> > + /*
> > + * v1 is just the original protocol with a version string,
> > + * so just fall through after writing the version string.
> > + */
>
> Peff sent out at least one patch [1] that reformats fallthrough comments
> to be understood by GCC. It's probably worth doing here too.
>
> In this case, I would do the 2-comment system that Peff suggested:
>
> /*
> * v1 is just the original protocol with a version string,
> * so just fall through after writing the version string.
> */
> if (advertise_refs || !stateless_rpc)
> packet_write_fmt(1, "version 1\n");
> /* fallthrough */
>
> (I put the first comment before the code, so it doesn't look so weird.)
Sounds good.
>
> [1]
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20170921062541.ew67gyvrmb2ot...@sigill.intra.peff.net/
>
> > + case protocol_v0:
> > + break;
> > + default:
I'm also going to change this to from default to
'protocol_unknown_version' that way we get a compiler error instead of a
run-time BUG when introducing a new protocol version number.
> > + BUG("unknown protocol version");
> > + }
--
Brandon Williams
