> Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> hat am 12. Oktober 2017 um 18:50 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> Am 12.10.2017 um 14:20 schrieb Thomas Braun:
> > In the commits 1d0fa898 (checkout: add --ignore-other-wortrees,
> > 2015-01-03), 1fc458d9 (builtin/checkout: add --recurse-submodules switch,
> > 2017-03-14), 870ebdb9 (checkout: add --progress option, 2015-11-01),
> > 08d595dc (checkout: add --ignore-skip-worktree-bits in sparse checkout
> > mode, 2013-04-13), 1d0fa898 (checkout: add --ignore-other-wortrees,
> > 2015-01-03), 32669671 (checkout: introduce --detach synonym for "git
> > checkout foo^{commit}", 2011-02-08) and db941099 (checkout -f: allow
> > ignoring unmerged paths when checking out of the index, 2008-08-30)
> > checkout gained new flags but the completion was not updated, although
> > these flags are useful completions. Add them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Braun <thomas.br...@virtuell-zuhause.de>
> > ---
> >   contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 4 +++-
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash 
> > b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> > index d934417475..393d4ae230 100644
> > --- a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> > +++ b/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
> > @@ -1250,7 +1250,9 @@ _git_checkout ()
> >     --*)
> >             __gitcomp "
> >                     --quiet --ours --theirs --track --no-track --merge
> > -                   --conflict= --orphan --patch
> > +                   --conflict= --orphan --patch --detach --progress 
> > --no-progress
> > +                   --force --ignore-skip-worktree-bits 
> > --ignore-other-worktrees
> 
> Destructive and dangerous options are typically not offered by command 
> completion. You should omit all three in the line above, IMO.
> 
> Furthermore, --progress and --no-progress are not useful in daily work 
> on the command line, I think. By offering them, --p<TAB> would not 
> complete to --patch anymore, you would need --pa<TAB>. You should omit 
> them, too.

Thanks for the review.

I've fixed that for the next reroll.

Reply via email to