Phillip Wood <[email protected]> writes:
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index
> ae24405c23d021ed7916e5e2d9df6de27f867a2e..3e4c3bbb265db58df22cfcb5a321fb74d822327e
> 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -477,9 +477,6 @@ static int do_recursive_merge(struct commit *base, struct
> commit *next,
> _(action_name(opts)));
> rollback_lock_file(&index_lock);
>
> - if (opts->signoff)
> - append_signoff(msgbuf, 0, 0);
> -
> if (!clean)
> append_conflicts_hint(msgbuf);
>
This function is called from only one place, do_pick_commit(), and
then the message returned from here in msgbuf is written to
merge_msg(), even when the merge conflicted.
And when the merge conflicts, sequencer would stop and gives the
control back to you---the MERGE_MSG file would have had the sign-off
when you conclude the conflict resolution.
With the new code, we instead add the sign-off before calling the
function to compensate for the above change, so MERGE_MSG file would
have the sign-off as before, when the sequencer stops.
> @@ -657,8 +654,6 @@ static int run_git_commit(const char *defmsg, struct
> replay_opts *opts,
> argv_array_push(&cmd.args, "--amend");
> if (opts->gpg_sign)
> argv_array_pushf(&cmd.args, "-S%s", opts->gpg_sign);
> - if (opts->signoff)
> - argv_array_push(&cmd.args, "-s");
> if (defmsg)
> argv_array_pushl(&cmd.args, "-F", defmsg, NULL);
> if ((flags & CLEANUP_MSG))
This has two callers.
The caller in do_pick_commit() is a bit curious; as we saw already,
the message file should already have the sign-off and then we used
to give another "-s" here. Were we depending on "-s" to become
no-op when the last sign-off is by the same person, I wonder? In
any case, the removal of "-s" from here won't hurt that caller.
The other caller is commit_staged_changes() which is called when
doing "rebase -i continue". I am not quite sure where the contents
stored in the file rebase_path_message() comes from. The function
error_failed_squash() moves SQUASH_MSG to it and then makes a copy
of it to MERGE_MSG, but that should only be relevant for squashed
commit and no other cases, so...?
I need to block a bit more time to read the relevant code to comment
on this step, especially on this removal.
Thanks for working on this, anyway.
> @@ -1347,6 +1342,9 @@ static int do_pick_commit(enum todo_command command,
> struct commit *commit,
> }
> }
>
> + if (opts->signoff)
> + append_signoff(&msgbuf, 0, 0);
> +
> if (is_rebase_i(opts) && write_author_script(msg.message) < 0)
> res = -1;
> else if (!opts->strategy || !strcmp(opts->strategy, "recursive") ||
> command == TODO_REVERT) {
