On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:44:46AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > We could also consider it a #leftoverbits that perhaps some other
> > Outreachy candidate would pick up[1].
> >
> > In the meantime, Junio, I think we'd want to queue this with the intent
> > to graduate it to "pu" or possibly "next", but not "master". Then if
> > somebody (Olga or another applicant) produces the endgame patch, we can
> > queue it on top and move it further. And if nobody does, I can pick it
> > after the application period is over.
> 
> So... do we still want to keep this in 'next', or does somebody
> wants to do honors?  
> 
> I'd really prefer *not* to see you or me ending up finishing it up,
> but at the same time, I really hate seeing a halfway or 3/4 done
> topic hanging around in 'pu'.

We hung back on it to leave it as low-hanging fruit for other Outreachy
applicants. Perhaps Olga would like to pick it up now that the
application period is over.

Alternatively, it might be a nice task for the Bloomberg hackathon this
weekend. I'll add it to the list of topics there, too.

-Peff

Reply via email to