Am 19.11.2017 um 01:42 schrieb [email protected]:
+#define trace_printf_key(key, ...) \
+ do { \
+ if (trace_pass_fl(key)) \
+ trace_printf_key_fl(TRACE_CONTEXT, __LINE__, key, \
+ __VA_ARGS__); \
+ } while(0)
+
+#define trace_printf(...) trace_printf_key(&trace_default_key, __VA_ARGS__);
+
+#define trace_argv_printf(argv, ...) \
+ do { \
+ if (trace_pass_fl(&trace_default_key))
\
+ trace_argv_printf_fl(TRACE_CONTEXT, __LINE__, \
+ argv, __VA_ARGS__); \
+ } while(0)
+
+#define trace_strbuf(key, data)
\
+ do { \
+ if (trace_pass_fl(key)) \
+ trace_strbuf_fl(TRACE_CONTEXT, __LINE__, key, data);\
+ } while(0)
+
+#define trace_performance(nanos, ...) \
+ do { \
+ if (trace_pass_fl(key)) \
The token "key" here looks suspicious. Did you mean &trace_perf_key?
+ trace_performance_fl(TRACE_CONTEXT, __LINE__, nanos,\
+ __VA_ARGS__); \
+ } while(0)
+
+#define trace_performance_since(start, ...) \
+ do { \
+ if (trace_pass_fl(&trace_perf_key)) \
+ trace_performance_fl(TRACE_CONTEXT, __LINE__, \
+ getnanotime() - (start), \
+ __VA_ARGS__); \
+ } while(0)
/* backend functions, use non-*fl macros instead */
__attribute__((format (printf, 4, 5)))
-- Hannes
