On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: >>> >>>> ... >>>> fixed. >>>> ... >>>> fixed the text... >>>> ... >>>> I am not fully convinced all descriptions are in recent history, but I >>>> tend to agree that most are, so probably the trade off is a wash. >>> >>> So what do we want with this topic? I think the "teach 'git log' to >>> highlight commits whose changes involve the given blob" is a more or >>> less an orthogonal thing, >> >> Well, both of them solve our immediate needs, so I'd be fine with pursuing >> just one of them, but I do not oppose taking both. >> >>> and I suspect that it is something users >>> may (although I personally do not) find valuable to have a related >>> but different feature in "git describe". >> >> agreed. > > I was reacting to your "fixed". So will we see a rerolled series or > not?
I was not planning on rerolling it. FYI: I am on vacation until next Monday, so if there is anything to be fixed here, I'd do it in a week, which may be enough time to warrant incremental fixes?
