Morten Welinder <[email protected]> writes:
> Is there a reason why picking among the choices in a sliding window
> must be contents neutral?
Sorry, you might be getting at something interesting but I do not
understand the question. I have no idea what you mean by "contents
neutral".
Picking between these two choices
/** + /**
+ * Default parent + * Default parent
+ * + *
+ * @var int + * @var int
+ * @access protected + * @access protected
+ * @index + * @index
+ */ + */
+ protected $defaultParent; + protected $defaultParent;
+ +
+ /** /**
would not affect the correctness of the patch. You may pick
whatever you deem the most desirable, but your answer must be a
correct patch (the definition of "correct" here is "applying that
patch to the preimage produces the intended postimage").
And I think if you inserted a block of text B after a context C
where the tail of B matches the tail of C like the above, you can
shift what you treat as "inserted" up and still come up with a
correct patch.
The output being "a correct patch" is not the only thing we need to
consider, though, as I mentioned in another response to Kevin
regarding the "consequences".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
