On Friday 15 December 2017 02:38 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
I think you only sent 3/3 in newer rounds, which made it not to
apply to my tree. If you meant to drop changes in 1/3 and 2/3,
perhaps because they were needless churn, then 3/3 needs to be
updated not to depend on the changes these two made.
Here is what I reconstructed to suit my taste better ;-)
Looks good to me except that your v4 3/3 seems to be spawning a subshell
is an oversight, I guess? Also, I guess it would be better if there was
comment in the code saying 'branch_nam' might hold a commit/branch name.
No worries I'll send a v5 to that thread based on your v4.
Thanks,
Kaartic
