René Scharfe <l....@web.de> writes:
> 7c117184d7 (bisect: fix off-by-one error in `best_bisection_sorted()`)
> fixed an off-by-one error, plugged a memory leak and removed a NULL
> check. However, the pointer p *is* actually NULL if an empty list is
> passed to the function. Let's add the check back for safety. Bisecting
> nothing doesn't make too much sense, but that's no excuse for crashing.
>
> Found with GCC's -Wnull-dereference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l....@web.de>
> ---
Thanks. I think this is the same as 2e9fdc79 ("bisect: fix a
regression causing a segfault", 2018-01-03) but the log we see here
explains what goes wrong much better than the other one ;-)
> bisect.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bisect.c b/bisect.c
> index 0fca17c02b..2f3008b078 100644
> --- a/bisect.c
> +++ b/bisect.c
> @@ -229,8 +229,10 @@ static struct commit_list *best_bisection_sorted(struct
> commit_list *list, int n
> if (i < cnt - 1)
> p = p->next;
> }
> - free_commit_list(p->next);
> - p->next = NULL;
> + if (p) {
> + free_commit_list(p->next);
> + p->next = NULL;
> + }
> strbuf_release(&buf);
> free(array);
> return list;
